Atiku Present As Tribunal Moves To Adopt Written Address Against Tinubu

The Presidential Election Petition Court has resumed sitting for the adoption of the written address of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, against the February 25 election victory of President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Atiku, Nigeria’s Vice-President between May 1999 and May 2007, was physically present in court today (Tuesday).

Today’s hearing majorly is for the parties to adopt all their various arguments which are already before the court.

You have brought shame to Nigeria Democracy- Atiku Abubakar Mocks Wike

After that is done, the court would either fix a date for judgement or reserve judgement.

The petitioners — PDP and Atiku as well as Labour Party (LP) and its flag bearer, Peter Obi — are praying for the nullification of Tinubu’s victory in the February 25 poll.

They are both praying to be named the winner of the election, or that a rerun to be conducted.

The parties filed and exchanged their final written addresses with the last being Tinubu’s reply on July 24 to the final written address by Atiku and the PDP.

While  Obi and the LP called 13 witnesses, tendered a lot of documents and closed their case on June 23, Atiku and the PDP called 27 witnesses, tendered documents and closed their case on June 23.

In the petition by Obi and his party, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) called one witness, tendered some documents and closed its case on July 4.

It also closed its case with the same witness in the petition by Atiku and the PDP, on July 3.

Counsel for Tinubu and his Vice, Kashim Shettima and APC closed their case in both petitions on July 5.

Though the counsel for Tinubu and Shettima called one witness and tendered documents, the APC did not call any witness in its defence in both petitions. The ruling party, however, tendered documents, including court judgments.

The three respondents (INEC, APC and Tinubu), urged the court to dismiss the petitions, arguing that the petitioners failed to establish their cases with credible evidence.

Live update:

11:30am -On his part, Counsel for the APC, Lateef Fagbemi, also prayed the court to dismiss the petition on the grounds that all the points raised in the petition has been ruled on by other court.

On the issue of 25% in Abuja, he said treating Abuja specially would be undue privilege, discrimination and elevation of a state, above others.

On the issue of election results, he noted that the petitioners did not prove that election did not hold in any area, neither did they prove that the results were proported as their witnesses did not disagree with the results of the election, as the only complain they had was the uploading of results.

On the issue of forfeiture, he noted that it was a civil forfeiture not a criminal one.

11:15am – Counsel for Tinubu and Shettima, Wole Olanikpekun, described the petitioners as meddlesome interloper.

He held that uploading of results to the IREV, either manually or electronically, played no role in the election process. He added that collation was physical and also manual.

Citing pages 10-11 of their address, he drew the attention of the court to the difference between transfer and transmit, the vertical, horizontal and the continuous use of the word or by the petitioner.

On the FCT, Olanikpekun held that the FCT is the 37th state in Nigeria for the purpose of the presidential election.

He added that the President won one quarter of the votes In two-third of the FCT.

11:13am – Mahmoud submitted that the major plank of the petitioners case is non-compliance with the electoral act, regulations and guidelines.

11:12am – On Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and INEC Result Viewing portal (IREV), Mahmoud argued that the evidence before the court showed that all the information generated by the BVAS in relation to transmission of results were stored in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) and it was the most secured and publicly available cloud service in the world.

He held that there was a test of vulnerability and application of the AWS.

He further held that inec showed good intention to make the election credible as manifested by the evidence before the court.

11:06am – In their final arguments, counsel for INEC, Abubakar Mahmoud, said it would amount to absurdity for the Tribunal to accept the argument of Atiku that one must secure 25% votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to emerge winner of a presidential election.

Citing Section 134 of the Constitution, Mahmoud said the FCT has no special status.

He added that it would amount to absurdity for residents of the FCT to be deemed as being more special than other Nigerians elsewhere who voted during the keenly contested election.

09:20am – Atiku arrives at the venue of the presidential tribunal at the Appeal Court in Abuja.