VeryDarkMan responds to EFCC press release inviting him and Bobrisky to their office

VeryDarkMan, whose real name is Martins Vincent Otse, has publicly responded to the EFCC’s invitation related to the case involving Bobrisky. Here’s a summary based on the information available up to September 25, 2024:

• Defiance Against EFCC: VeryDarkMan has openly stated his refusal to comply with the EFCC’s invitation to appear in Lagos concerning Bobrisky’s case. He expressed his disdain by setting conditions that would have to be met by the EFCC before he would consider attending. This includes demands like the EFCC investigating its own officers for potential corruption, particularly in relation to Bobrisky’s case where allegations of a bribe were made.
• Criticism of EFCC: He criticized the EFCC’s approach, suggesting that they should first investigate their officers and then proceed with Bobrisky before involving him. VeryDarkMan’s stance seems rooted in a broader critique of how the EFCC handles cases, potentially highlighting what he perceives as inconsistencies or biases in their operations.
• Public Statements: His response wasn’t just a refusal but also a call to action or at least a public challenge to the EFCC’s credibility and methods. He mentioned not having the financial or political backing (like “a godfather or N15 million”) to navigate what he implies might be a corrupt system, thereby questioning the fairness and impartiality of the legal process as applied to different segments of society.
• Implications: This situation underscores the ongoing tension between public figures like VeryDarkMan and governmental or regulatory bodies like the EFCC. His refusal could be seen as an act of defiance against perceived injustices or overreaches by law enforcement, potentially resonating with segments of the public who feel similarly about institutional practices in Nigeria.

VeryDarkMan’s response to the EFCC not only highlights his personal stance on legal proceedings involving him or those he comments on but also reflects broader themes of accountability, transparency, and the relationship between public figures and law enforcement in Nigeria. His actions might encourage or reflect public sentiment regarding how such cases are handled, advocating for a more transparent and fair judicial process.